EuroLeague player

MUSTAFA ABI

EFES PILSEN · Guard (Official season position)

TürkiyeSeason 2004–05

Official EuroLeague profile (opens in a new tab)

Selected season · EuroLeague 2004–05

Selected season snapshot

MPG
15.0
#186 of 221
PPG
2.3
#215 of 221
RPG
1.0
#215 of 221
APG
0.6
#166 of 221
PIR
0.6
#220 of 221

Rating profile

Six season-relative components behind the BasketScope Rating.

Scoring13
Playmaking32
Ball security49
Rebounding9
Defensive production22
Role50

Profile summary

The profile is led by role and ball security. Rebounding is less prominent relative to the player's other components.

What do these components mean?
Scoring
Scoring volume and shooting efficiency.
Playmaking
Creation for teammates through assists.
Ball security
Decision-making balance between assists and turnovers.
Rebounding
Overall, offensive and defensive rebounding production.
Defensive production
Box-score defensive activity through steals, blocks and foul discipline.
Role
The size and consistency of the player's role during the season.

Component scores are season-relative measures. A score around 50 is near the middle of the relevant season reference groups; higher scores indicate stronger performance in that component.

Component scores are not added directly. The final BasketScope Rating applies different component weights and the approved sample rules.

Career snapshot

Recorded EuroLeague career

Seasons
7
Games
78
Clubs
3
MPG
12.7
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.1
APG
0.5
PIR
0.3
Best season by PIR2001-02

ULKER

PIR
1.7
PPG
2.6
RPG
1.2
APG
0.7
Open season ↗

Selected season · Per game and Per 28

Selected season statistics

Rank context
EuroLeague 2004–05 per-game and per-28 statistics with qualified-pool rank, grouped into Production, Shooting (pace-independent -- value and rank repeated in both columns), Possession and discipline (Turnovers and Fouls show values only, no official rank) and Sample context. Currently ranked against all players.
MetricPer gamePer 28
Production
Points2.3#215 of 2214.4#217 of 221
Rebounds1.0#215 of 2212.0#207 of 221
Assists0.6#166 of 2211.2#133 of 221
Steals0.3#204 of 2210.6#198 of 221
Blocks0.0#168 of 2210.1#148 of 221
PIR0.6#220 of 2211.1#220 of 221
Plus/minus
Shooting · pace-independent
Percentages are pace-independent. Official ranks require minimum attempt volumes. 3PAr and FTr rank a player's position in the shot-selection distribution, not better or worse play.
FG%43.9%Insufficient attempts41 of 75 required43.9%Insufficient attemptsSame rate
2PT%54.2%Insufficient attempts24 of 40 required54.2%Insufficient attemptsSame rate
3PT%29.4%Insufficient attempts17 of 30 required29.4%Insufficient attemptsSame rate
FT%61.5%Insufficient attempts13 of 20 required61.5%Insufficient attemptsSame rate
True shooting %52.4%Insufficient attempts47 of 75 required52.4%Insufficient attemptsSame rate
eFG%50.0%Insufficient volume50.0%Insufficient volumeSame rate
3PAr41.5%Insufficient volume41.5%Insufficient volumeSame rate
FTr31.7%Insufficient volume31.7%Insufficient volumeSame rate
Possession and discipline
Raw turnover and foul ranks are withheld pending role-adjusted methodology; TOV% (lower is better) is ranked.
Turnovers0.5Role-dependent metric0.9Role-dependent metric
Fouls2.5Role-dependent metric4.7Role-dependent metric
AST/TO1.30Insufficient volume13 AST · 10 TO1.30Insufficient volumeSame ratio
TOV%17.6%Insufficient volume17.6%Insufficient volumeSame rate
Rebounding
Estimated rebound-opportunity rates from box-score totals and playing time, not lineup data. Ranks require a minimum on-court sample.
ORB%0.9%#191 of 1940.9%#191 of 194Same rate
DRB%8.7%#151 of 1948.7%#151 of 194Same rate
TRB%4.9%#171 of 1944.9%#171 of 194Same rate
Defence & hustle
Estimated defensive rates and fouls drawn from official box-score inputs, not play-by-play. Ranks require a minimum on-court sample.
STL%1.3%#170 of 1941.3%#170 of 194Same rate
BLK%0.4%#111 of 1940.4%#111 of 194Same rate
FD/281.2#190 of 194
Sample context
Games describe the same sample; 28.0 minutes is the normalization basis.
Games2121Same sample
Minutes15.0#186 of 22128.0Normalization basis

Per 28: Projects counting statistics to a 28-minute pace. Percentages and ratios remain unchanged.

Ranking availability: Shooting ranks require minimum attempt volumes. Turnover and foul ranks are withheld pending role-adjusted methodology. Plus/minus has no Per 28 projection.

About advanced statistics

The Rebounding and Defence & hustle groups above are estimated rates. Each player-game contributes a time share = player minutes ÷ (team player-minutes ÷ 5), and the numerator (rebounds, steals, blocks) is divided by that share of the available opportunities — rebound chances (team + opponent boards), estimated opponent possessions for STL%, and opponent two-point attempts for BLK%. FD/28 is fouls drawn per 28 minutes. These are estimates from standard box-score totals and playing time, notplay-by-play, lineup or matchup data; a missing input leaves a metric unavailable (—), never a fabricated zero.

Ranks. Every advanced metric is ranked against the same qualified pool as the standard statistics and honours the All players / Same position toggle. eFG%, 3PAr and FTr require 75 field-goal attempts; TOV% requires 100 estimated scoring possessions; the estimated rebounding and defensive rates require 200on-court minutes — all in addition to the standard leaderboard eligibility, and ties share a rank. eFG% and the rebounding/defensive rates rank higher-is-better; TOV% ranks lower-is-better.

3PAr and FTr describe shot selection, not better-or-worse play: their rank shows where a player sits in the shot-selection distribution, not quality. See Data & methodology, and full formulas under How this profile is calculated below.

Selected season

Ranking and percentiles

Compared with 86 qualified guards in EuroLeague 2004–05.

Overall percentile1th · Weak
#214 of 221 qualified players
Position percentile2th · Weak
#82 of 86 qualified guards

Qualified ranks include leaderboard-eligible players only. Percentiles describe the full season pool, including provisional players.

Career

Career production trend

  • 1.72001-02
  • 0.02002-03
  • 0.62004-05
  • -1.22005-06
  • -0.12006-07
  • 0.62007-08
  • 2008-09

PIR per game, oldest to most recent season. Bars only -- no value is interpolated between seasons, and a missing season shows as no bar rather than zero.

Career

Club timeline

Career history

Season by season

7 recorded seasons
SeasonClubW-LGPMPGPPGRPGAPGPIRFG3PTFT+/−/GRatingDataStatus
2008-09EFES PILSEN00.0UnavailableUnavailable
2007-08EFES PILSEN6–91512.41.50.70.30.646.7%60.0%62.5%30CompleteQualified
2006-07EFES PILSEN8–101816.11.61.60.5-0.130.3%23.5%55.6%30CompleteQualified
2005-06EFES PILSEN6–6127.70.20.60.1-1.233.3%0.0%30PartialProvisional
2004-05EFES PILSEN15–62115.02.31.10.60.643.9%29.4%61.5%30CompleteQualified
2002-03ULKER0–111.00.00.00.00.041PartialProvisional
2001-02ULKER5–61110.02.61.20.71.747.4%66.7%50.0%40CompleteProvisional

W-Lrepresents the team’s win–loss record only in games where the player appeared.

Career

Career overview

MUSTAFA ABI has played 7 EuroLeague seasons across 3 clubs.

The best recorded PIR season is 2001-02 at 1.7 PIR per game.

Games78
Starts30
Points131
Rebounds82
Assists35
Career PIR25
How this profile is calculated
Statistical basis
The rating, components, production and efficiency figures shown here are computed from the selected season’s recorded box scores only -- no other season is blended in.
Peer comparison
Qualified ranks and percentiles compare this player against other leaderboard-eligible players in the same season, narrowed to a position peer group when one is available.
Sample confidence
A limited games/minutes sample lowers confidence and can make the season provisional, which excludes it from qualified rankings.
Shooting rank thresholds
Shooting-percentage ranks require the same qualification rule above, plus a minimum attempt volume for that metric: FG% 75 attempts, 2PT% 40 attempts, 3PT% 30 attempts, FT% 20 attempts, True shooting % 75 TS attempts. Ranks are calculated only among players meeting that same threshold. Pace normalization (Per 28) does not change percentages or ratios, so their value and rank repeat unchanged in both columns. Turnover and foul ranks are withheld pending a role-adjusted methodology.
Shooting efficiency
TS%, eFG%, 3PAr and FTr are computed from this season’s official box-score totals, summed across every club stint before dividing. TS% = points / (2 × (FGA + 0.44 × FTA)), eFG% = (FGM + 0.5 × 3PM) / FGA, 3PAr = 3PA / FGA and FTr = FTA / FGA (free-throw attempts, not makes), with FGA = 2PA + 3PA. 3PAr and FTr describe shot selection and are shown as neutral profile measures — no rank, percentile or colour. A metric is left unavailable (—) when an input is missing or there are no attempts; it is never shown as zero. These metrics are part of the standard-data Advanced Analytics foundation and may inform a future rating generation; publishing them does not affect the currently deployed BasketScope Rating, whose TS% uses the identical denominator.
Playmaking & ball security
AST/TO and TOV% are computed from this season’s official totals, summed across every club stint before dividing. AST/TO = assists / turnovers, a plain ratio shown to two decimals (not a percentage); higher is generally favourable. With no turnovers the ratio is undefined, so it is shown as an em dash with a reason (“No turnovers recorded”), never Infinity. TOV% = TO / (FGA + 0.44 × FTA + TO), with FGA = 2PA + 3PA; lower is generally favourable. Its denominator is an estimateof scoring possessions from standard box-score inputs (field-goal attempts, free-throw attempts and turnovers) — it is notderived from collected possession or play-by-play data. A sourced zero turnovers over a positive denominator is a genuine 0.0%; a missing input or zero denominator leaves the metric unavailable (—), never zero. Both are part of the standard-data Advanced Analytics foundation and may be considered later as candidate inputs for a future rating generation; publishing them does not affect the currently deployed BasketScope Rating or its ranks.
Rebounding context
ORB%, DRB% and TRB% are estimatedrebound-opportunity percentages derived from standard box-score totals and playing time — not possession- or lineup-level measurement. For each game, a player’s time share = player minutes ÷ (team player-minutes ÷ 5), so actual team minutes set the on-court basis and overtime is handled naturally (never assumed to be 40). Opportunities per game are ORB% = team OREB + opponent DREB, DRB% = team DREB + opponent OREB, and TRB% = all four; each is scaled by time share. The player’s rebounds and these opportunity denominators are summed across every game and club stint, then divided once — never an average of per-game or per-club percentages. A metric is unavailable (—) when a required input is missing or the opportunity denominator is zero; a valid denominator with zero rebounds is a genuine 0.0%. Both are part of the standard-data Advanced Analytics foundation and may be considered later as candidate inputs for a future rating generation; richer lineup and play-by-play inputs are not part of the current standard-data methodology. Publishing them does not affect the currently deployed BasketScope Rating or its ranks.
Defensive & hustle context
STL%, BLK% and FD/28 are computed from this season’s official totals, summed across every club stint before dividing. STL% = steals / (time share × estimated opponent possessions), where estimated opponent possessions = opp 2PA + opp 3PA +  0.44 × opp FTA − opp OREB + opp TO (the 0.44 free-throw weight is the documented v1 convention). BLK% = blocks / (time share × opponent 2PA); whether a block landed on a two- or three-point attempt is not inferred, and values are not clamped. Time share = player minutes ÷ (team player-minutes ÷ 5), so actual team minutes handle overtime. Both are estimatesfrom standard box-score totals — not possession-by-possession, matchup or lineup measurement. FD/28 = fouls drawn ÷ minutes × 28, a plain per-28 rate (not a percentage, not a possession rate). A metric is unavailable (—) when a required input is missing or the opportunity denominator is zero; a valid denominator with zero steals/blocks/fouls-drawn is a genuine 0.0. All three are part of the standard-data Advanced Analytics foundation and may be considered later as candidate inputs for a future rating generation; richer lineup, play-by-play and matchup inputs are not part of the current standard-data methodology. Publishing them does not affect the currently deployed BasketScope Rating or its ranks.
AST/TO rank threshold
AST/TO ranks require at least 40 assists and 15 turnovers, in addition to general qualification -- this limits low-volume ratio outliers. AST/TO is unchanged under Per 28 normalization, so its value and rank repeat in both columns. Zero-turnover ratios are not ranked.
Position source
Guard -- Verified season record.
Data labels
Ordinary source-backed values (a listed height, an official-profile position) are shown with no label. A small, secondary label is added only where a value’s status is not obvious:
  • OfficialDirectly published by EuroLeague, a club, federation, or another primary source.
  • ReportedPublished by a credible media source but not formally confirmed.
  • EstimateApproximate value calculated or assessed from available evidence.
  • PartialData is incomplete, covers only part of the season, or is missing some records.
  • DerivedCalculated by BasketScope from underlying statistics.
Sourced vs. generated
Identity, career totals and box-score production are sourced facts. The rating, components, ranks, percentiles and summary sentences are BasketScope-generated from those facts using a fixed, deterministic method -- never an AI model.
What this does not measure
Tactical fit, leadership, off-ball defense and future potential are not measured or implied by any figure on this page.
Selected-season context
Figures on this page reflect EuroLeague 2004–05, refreshed periodically from imported season data.